instructionsBy the due date assigned, submit your revised Annotated Bibliography.Proofread your work carefully, ensuring that your in-text citations and reference entries conform to APA style. Rough draft is down below   ReferencesCellini, S. R., & Goldin, C. (2014). Does federal student aid raise tuition? New evidence on for-profit colleges. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(4), 174-206.Kimberling, C. R. (2018). Federal student aid: A history and critical analysis. In The academy in crisis (pp. 69-93). Routledge.Rueben, K., Gault, S., & Baum, S. (2015). Simplifying federal student aid. Retrieved from. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/72826/2000507-simplifying-federal-student-aid-how-do-the-plans-stack-up.pdf  Explanation:Federal Student AidAnnotated BibliographyRueben, K., Gault, S., & Baum, S. (2015). Simplifying federal student aid. Retrieved from. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/72826/2000507-simplifying-federal-student-aid-how-do-the-plans-stack-up.pdfAccording to the author, the complexity of the federal student assistance application process, the confusing number of programs offered, and the bureaucratic hurdles involved in managing student loan repayment have long been lamented by researchers and activists. This paper examines the cost and distributional implications of different suggestions for system simplification. Some suggestions aim to make applying for and predicting eligibility for the federal Pell award program easier. Others are working to simplify the federal need analysis system, which generates a “expected family contribution” (EFC) that is used to determine most state and institutional aid in addition to federal need-based help. The source passes the credibility test because it is a peer reviewed paper from a credible online library. The author also supports his work with literature from other sources. It is within the 10 year gap of research meaning it has the most recent analysis and data. This source is related to the given topic because it offers a better insight about the Federal student aid and a deeper understanding of the whole concept. This article will be applied in research to present the significance of federal student aid and its complications. Kimberling, C. R. (2018). Federal student aid: A history and critical analysis. In The academy in crisis (pp. 69-93). Routledge.According to the author, student aid, which accounted for $10.3 billion or 47.4 percent of total federal postsecondary education expenditures in fiscal year 1985, is the biggest category of government financial support for higher education. Traditional means of federal government financial assistance for higher education have clearly been eclipsed by student aid. The renewal of the Higher Education Act (HEA) in 1992 resulted in expanded middle-class eligibility for Federal Pell Grants. Home equity, as well as large sums of agricultural and family business assets, were permanently exempt from means testing. The work of reauthorizing the HEA was taken up by Congress and the administration as the 1990s started. Higher education, like all other federal services, will undoubtedly be scrutinized in the future. On a wider scale, academic administrators must consider how reliance on federal student assistance funds has paved the way for extensive federal control of academic and administrative concerns that were formerly the responsibility of individual institutions. The source passes the credibility test because it is a peer reviewed paper from a credible online library. The author also supports his work with literature from other sources. It is within the 10 year gap of research meaning it has the most recent analysis and data. The article is related to the given topic because it presents the history of Federal Student Aid and the developments which have been made since then. It will be useful in referencing on the development of the student aid over the years.Cellini, S. R., & Goldin, C. (2014). Does federal student aid raise tuition? New evidence on for-profit colleges. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(4), 174-206.According to the authors, they present the first complete estimates of the for-profit higher education sector’s size and assess whether for-profits raise tuition in response to public assistance. We include colleges that do not participate in federal student assistance programs and are not counted in official statistics by using state administrative data. In comparison to official figures, including these schools doubles the number of for-profits and raises the number of students by one-third. Tuition for sub-baccalaureate (primarily certificate) programs at assistance-eligible colleges is roughly 78 percent more than tuition at non-participating institutions, providing some weight to the “Bennett theory” of federal aid capture. The source passes the credibility test because it is a peer reviewed paper from a credible online library. The author also supports his work with literature from other sources. It is within the 10 year gap of research meaning it has the most recent analysis and data. The author presents reliable research because it is related to the topic, whereas, they present the fact that the students who access the federal aid might be faced by the challenge of paying higher to cushion the government on other unknown aspects. This article will help in showing the good and the bad side of the student aid.ReferencesCellini, S. R., & Goldin, C. (2014). Does federal student aid raise tuition? New evidence on for-profit colleges. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(4), 174-206.Kimberling, C. R. (2018). Federal student aid: A history and critical analysis. In The academy in crisis (pp. 69-93). Routledge.Rueben, K., Gault, S., & Baum, S. (2015). Simplifying federal student aid. Retrieved from. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/72826/2000507-simplifying-federal-student-aid-how-do-the-plans-stack-up.pdf      Arts & Humanities English ENGLISH ENG1200